Home Fantasy Sports Predicting the 2009-2010 NHL Standings
Predicting the 2009-2010 NHL Standings PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bill Rizer   
Thursday, 18 June 2009 15:56

Hockey has come to a close and I know I’m a bit slow acknowledging that fact. Perhaps it’s because there are no sports worth watching on television at the moment. I guess CFL football is starting soon, but I really only watch it because it’s an excuse to get drunk - it’s not like it is incredibly entertaining or anything. Perhaps if the Eskimos crush the Riders every night like they did last night it will be entertaining. Especially considering I live in the heartland of Rider pride.

Regardless I was extremely successful in my playoff fantasy pool and finally pulled out a victory for the first time in a long time. I finished with 154 points led mostly by Evgeni Malkin which put me 19 points clear of second, 50 points clear of third and a whopping 104 points clear of last place. It was a drubbing, and if Chad hadn’t have selected the same teams as me it would have been even worse. Amazingly my statistical analysis of the playoffs seemed to work - I definitely had a leg up on the field. I’ll admit that teams have to continue to play as you expect them to for my analysis to be accurate, but it worked out this year that’s for sure.

So in keeping with that theme I thought I’d apply what I developed for the playoffs to predicting the standings in the upcoming NHL season. Below are my initial rankings utilizing last years rosters as they ended as well as making some projections for players that had off years or suffered injuries (or players like Jose Theodore or J.S. Giguere that may not end up the starter). I had to do some adjusting to normalize the numbers and I will admit that the win percentages yield slightly less wins than required (every game needs a winner), but this is mostly due to rounding and the bottom feeder teams. Plus I added a few points to each total for overtime losses. I will work on fixing that in subsequent analysis. I will update this again once the draft and free agent signings take place, as well as again just prior to the season starting so that I can get the most up to date roster possible. From there I plan on using the game results after about 25 games to adjust my predictions and potentially indicate teams that are lower or higher in the standings than they should be.

So what point is there for this? Well I’m not sure, I’m mostly doing this as an experiment to see how close I can get to the actual finish. Obviously this being my first attempt I anticipate some issues and I know that my projections for injured players could use a bit of work. I did see some research on predicting player totals following an injury, but haven’t dove into understanding that yet. I think from a fantasy perspective it could be useful in predicting which goalies might be valuable as getting wins always seems to be a bit of a crapshoot. Anyway take it for what it’s worth and we’ll see how accurate I can be.

Revision 2 of this article is available here

Revision 1 of this article is available here

TEAMGPGFGAP(W%)PointsPos
BOSTON822912140.7041201
PITTSBURGH822942420.6411102
WASHINGTON822712230.6301083
CAROLINA822492200.5801004
NEW JERSEY822362120.568985
PHILADELPHIA822622390.566986
BUFFALO822402320.521907
FLORIDA822292220.518908
MONTREAL822462490.48985 
NEW YORK R822072180.46982 
OTTAWA822042450.38768 
ATLANTA822282790.36164 
TAMPA BAY821842490.32658 
TORONTO822142810.32158 
NEW YORK I821822670.27650 
TEAMGPGFGAP(W%)PointsPos
DETROIT822842420.6141061
VANCOUVER822462110.5961032
SAN JOSE822402110.5811003
CHICAGO822552200.5961034
MINNESOTA822352030.5901025
COLUMBUS822402290.531926
CALGARY822632590.512897
ST. LOUIS822252250.499878
DALLAS822602630.49386 
ANAHEIM822212260.48685 
LOS ANGELES822132220.47483 
EDMONTON822472590.46782 
NASHVILLE822062220.45780 
PHOENIX822062540.37066 
COLORADO821882580.31356 
 
Comments (3)
1 Friday, 19 June 2009 08:32
Lance Bean
I have a hard time believing that Boston can actually repeat the torrid pace they had this year. A team full of plugs all had career years. The precarious house of cards has to collapse sometime.

I think you are being optimistic with the Oilers, Flames and Blues. Western conference is a crapshoot after the top Three or four teams, but I am pretty sure you can count on the Oil sucking ass unless there are some HUGE changes. The Flames, without radically changing their game will not have the start to the season that they had this year that basically carried them through till the end. I just hate the Blues and wish them a poor season.

Can't we just hope for Toronto, Montreal and Ottawa to all have the same trouble that Montreal had this year?
2 Friday, 19 June 2009 23:33
Rich
Seems interesting guy, but I also don't know if Boston can really rock that many points. They should do well again, but 120?!? Thomas can't get that lucky again. Crazy talk. Same as the Wild, no way they make the show, let alone in 5th. Good to see my Jackets up there though.
3 Saturday, 20 June 2009 10:41
Bill Rizer
Well I bumped Thomas' GAA down to 2.50 and provided their players score exactly how they did last year that's what my little number engine suggests. As for the Wild that's if Gaborik can play a full season and score 35 goals. Which he would if he could stay healthy. Basically they have one of the best goalies and if they get any offense they are a playoff team. I do no adjustment based on personal inkling.
Please register or login to add your comments to this article.