Home Fantasy Sports Predicting the 2009-2010 NHL Standings: Revision 1
Predicting the 2009-2010 NHL Standings: Revision 1 PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bill Rizer   
Wednesday, 22 July 2009 09:48

The action has been fast and furious on the free agent market, and yet there are still some players left that could have a serious impact on my results below. I addressed some issues with the bottom feeders having win percentages that were way too low. In the process it seems to have flattened out the standings, but I think I am a lot closer to the results I am looking for. I still have a problem predicting what a player like Steve Stamkos is going to do. He had a good second half, but his first half is almost certainly lower than what he will produce this year. Due to the lack of NHL data on Stamkos my algorithm has some problems predicting his stats accurately. I'll work on that for the next revision and hopefully by then some other sites will have some predicitons for players like him that I can utilize.

I must reiterate that this is based solely on statistical analysis and predictive models. My personal feelings as to how teams will finish doesn't play into it and therefore you can't say "You have team A way too high/low". While I might agree with you I can't argue with the numbers, especially considering how accurate they were in predicting the NHL Playoffs last season. For example in this result set I question the Flames and Flyers position, but looking at what the model predicted I can understand why it came up with what it did. Calgary adding Bouwmeester on the back end is a great signing, but losing cammalleri's goals up front makes them strapped for scoring. Similarly with Philly, they added Pronger but lost Lupul and Knuble. Obviously there is potential someone will step up and fill in those holes, but I think the model did a good job of identifying those players (Moss and Bourque in Calgary, Giroux and Briere in Philly). Therefore I can't even recommend an adjustment. I will likely do two more updates prior to the season starting and will continue to adjust as the season is in progress.

Revision 2 of this article is available here

TEAMGPGFGAP(W%)PointsPos
BOSTON822872140.6951141
WASHINGTON822962330.6331102
PITTSBURGH822912420.6331043
CAROLINA822492200.580954
NEW JERSEY822302120.550905
NY RANGERS822332180.539886
MONTREAL822612490.533877
BUFFALO822362320.511848
FLORIDA822242210.50783 
PHILADELPHIA822332330.50182 
ATLANTA822672790.46777 
OTTAWA822282450.45374 
TAMPA BAY822072360.42269 
NY ISLANDERS822052500.37562 
TORONTO822082540.37461 
TEAMGPGFGAP(W%)PointsPos
VANCOUVER822582150.6171011
CHICAGO822752380.602992
DALLAS822602350.570943
COLUMBUS822612280.592974
DETROIT822672380.579955
SAN JOSE822402150.568936
ANAHEIM822452220.563927
MINNESOTA822252030.562928
EDMONTON822382270.53087 
ST. LOUIS822252140.53087 
CALGARY822382290.52486 
LOS ANGELES822312220.52486 
NASHVILLE822092260.45575 
PHOENIX822242590.40566 
COLORADO821972410.37962 
 
Please register or login to add your comments to this article.